Comparison
Goodie AI alternatives, compared honestly
Goodie AI publishes $399/mo (Explorer). Pro and Enterprise are not published — both say “Get a Demo”. We publish $99 for ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude. This page sets the rest of both lists side by side, including the rows where they win — every figure read from their own pages on August 11, 2026.
- No account to compare
- Every figure sourced
- Read August 11, 2026
First, what Goodie AI is good at
By some distance the widest product in this comparison: it does not stop at measuring. Alongside visibility monitoring it publishes an optimization-actions workflow, a content studio, an agent-and-crawler suite for how AI systems read your site, attribution, and its own MCP server. If what you want is one platform that measures AI visibility and then does something about it, rather than a measurement tool you act on elsewhere, Goodie is built for exactly that and most of the category is not.
Goodie is sold as a closed loop — monitor, optimise, attribute — and that is a genuinely different product from a tracker. The optimization actions, the AEO writer and the agent-experience suite are things we do not do at all, in any tier, at any price. If your problem is “we can see we are invisible and we do not know what to change”, that gap is the whole reason a suite exists.
Two things about the pricing are worth reading before the first call. The published tier is $399 a month, which is the highest self-serve entry price in this comparison, and it covers ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews and Perplexity. Gemini is on Pro and Claude is on Enterprise, and neither Pro nor Enterprise carries a published price — so the three assistants most consumer buyers actually open are spread across all three of their tiers, two of which you have to ask for.
You can read all of that on their own pricing page, which is where the figures below came from.
Goodie AI and Mentionify,
on what each one publishes
Not a feature checklist — the rows a buyer argues about after the first invoice. What Goodie AI meters at the entry price: 100 prompts and 3,000 AI responses a month, plus 10 optimization actions.
| Goodie AI | Mentionify | |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $399/mo (Explorer). Pro and Enterprise are not published — both say “Get a Demo”. | Free (Snapshot), then $99/mo (Micro). Top published tier $1,499/mo, plus a custom builder. |
| Buy without a sales call | Yes on Explorer, which their pricing page calls fully self-serve. Pro and Enterprise are sales-led. | Yes, by card on Stripe's hosted checkout. No sales call exists to have. |
| Free access | No free plan. A 7-day free trial on Explorer. | A free plan with no card — 20 credits a month — and a no-account checker that runs one question against Gemini for a work email. |
| Assistants at the entry price | Three: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews and Perplexity. | Three: ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude, on every paid plan including the $99 one. |
| Full coverage, and what it costs | Up to eleven, on Enterprise, which is unpriced. Gemini arrives on Pro and Claude only on Enterprise — so neither is available at any price they publish. | Those three, and no others. We do not measure Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Copilot, Grok, DeepSeek or Meta AI — the pipeline asks the three assistants directly and there is no page-scraping path in it. |
| What the entry price meters | 100 prompts and 3,000 AI responses a month, plus 10 optimization actions. | A credit bucket, not a prompt cap: 350 credits a month on the entry plan, spent as you choose. One check is one topic on one assistant — Gemini 1 credit, ChatGPT 2, Claude 3. |
| Seats | Three on Explorer, five on Pro, unlimited on Enterprise. The price of an extra seat is not published. | Unlimited, free. Projects and tracked competitors are unlimited too. |
| Shows the whole answer | Not published. Their monitoring page describes mentions, ranking position, sentiment and citing domains, but does not say whether the full response text is shown. | Yes — the complete answer text for every run, exportable to XLSX with the rest of the dataset. |
| Shows cited sources | Yes — “top domains citing you” and which sources the AI relies on. Whether every URL is listed per answer is not published. | Yes — every cited domain and page, per assistant, with the searches the model actually ran. |
| Competitor tracking | Yes — direct and indirect competitors together, with share of voice, mention frequency and sentiment comparison. Any limit is not published. | Yes, unlimited — and each competitor's domain is verified by fetching the site and requiring the page to name the company before it can key a row. |
| Term | Monthly or annual, the annual toggle badged “save 20%”. | Monthly or annual (−15%), self-serve cancel, and a full refund within 14 days if no credits were spent. |
| Top published tier | Custom (Enterprise). | $1,499/mo, published. |
Where the Goodie AI figures come from. Read on August 11, 2026 from their own public pages — pricing, product and help centre — never from a review site or from anyone’s comparison page, ours included. A cell reading “not published” is something Goodie AI does not state anywhere, and we have not signed up for their product, so every claim about how it behaves is their own description of it. Check a price before you rely on it. Sources: the $399 Explorer price, the three-engine entry tier, the 100-prompt / 3,000-response allowance, the seat counts, the 7-day trial and the annual discount; the monitoring feature set — share of voice, sentiment, ranking position and citing domains.
What $399 actually buys,
on both sides.
The widest product here against the narrowest. Their published tier costs four times ours and still does not reach Gemini or Claude.
Goodie AI — Explorer, $399/mo
- Three engines: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews and Perplexity. Gemini is on Pro, Claude on Enterprise, and neither tier is priced.
- 100 prompts and 3,000 AI responses a month — a far bigger allowance than ours, and about 13 cents a response against our 28.
- 10 optimization actions a month, plus the content studio, the crawler-and-agent suite and attribution. We have no equivalent to any of it.
- Three seats on Explorer, five on Pro. The cost of an extra seat is not published.
- A 7-day trial, no free plan, and annual billing badged “save 20%”.
Mentionify — Micro, $99/mo
- ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude, all three, on the cheapest paid plan — the combination their published tier cannot buy.
- 350 credits a month: Gemini 1, ChatGPT 2, Claude 3, so one question on all three is 6 credits a run. Roughly 13 questions a week on all three.
- Measurement only. No optimization actions, no content generation, no crawler analytics — if you need those, this is the wrong tool and Goodie is the right one.
- Unlimited seats, free, and unlimited projects and tracked competitors.
- A free plan with no card, a no-account checker, and a full refund inside 14 days if no credits were spent.
Where this lands against us. Goodie is the bigger product and the better value per response — 3,000 responses for $399 works out cheaper per answer than 350 credits for $99, and everything they do after the measurement we simply do not do. If you want a platform that tells you what to change and then helps you change it, buy theirs; we would only be half of what you are shopping for. The single line where the comparison turns is coverage against price: at $399 you get ChatGPT, AI Overviews and Perplexity, and the pairing of Gemini with Claude is not on any tier they publish a number for.
Who should buy Goodie AI,
and who should buy us.
Buy Goodie AI if
- Teams that need to act, not just measure — optimization actions, an AEO content studio and attribution are a different job from tracking, and we do none of it.
- Anyone who needs to know how AI crawlers and agents read their site. Their agent-experience suite has no counterpart here.
- Larger programmes: 100 prompts and 3,000 responses at the entry tier is several times the volume our entry plan funds.
Buy Mentionify if
- Anyone whose three assistants are ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude — that exact set is $99 here and is not on any published Goodie tier.
- Buyers who want the whole price list on the page. Two of their three tiers are “Get a Demo”; all four of ours carry a number.
- Small teams for whom $399 a month is the decision rather than a line item, and who want to start measuring before they commit to a suite.
Where we are different
These are different tools and the honest version is that Goodie does more than we do. The reason someone shopping there ends up here is almost always the same line on the pricing page: the tier you can buy covers ChatGPT, AI Overviews and Perplexity, and if what you needed was ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude, that combination is not for sale at any published Goodie price. We only measure — no optimization workflow, no content tooling, no crawler analytics — but the three assistants are on the $99 plan and the whole answer is on screen.
Wider than Goodie AI and us? The ten-tool comparison is ordered by entry price. Deeper? The methodology and the score.
Goodie AI questions
What is the best Goodie AI alternative?
That depends on which part of Goodie AI you are replacing. By some distance the widest product in this comparison: it does not stop at measuring. Alongside visibility monitoring it publishes an optimization-actions workflow, a content studio, an agent-and-crawler suite for how AI systems read your site, attribution, and its own MCP server. If what you want is one platform that measures AI visibility and then does something about it, rather than a measurement tool you act on elsewhere, Goodie is built for exactly that and most of the category is not. Their entry tier is $399/mo (Explorer). Pro and Enterprise are not published — both say “Get a Demo”. against our $99, and the table below sets the rest of their published terms beside ours. If neither shape fits, the ten-tool comparison covers the category — several of them are cheaper than both of us.
How much does Goodie AI cost?
$399/mo (Explorer). Pro and Enterprise are not published — both say “Get a Demo”. Yes on Explorer, which their pricing page calls fully self-serve. Pro and Enterprise are sales-led. Read on August 11, 2026 from their own pricing page; check it before you rely on it, as this category reprices often.
Which AI assistants does Goodie AI cover?
At the entry price: Three: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews and Perplexity. Their full published coverage: Up to eleven, on Enterprise, which is unpriced. Gemini arrives on Pro and Claude only on Enterprise — so neither is available at any price they publish. Read those two sentences as one question — what is on the tier you would actually buy, rather than what is on the homepage.
Does Mentionify do everything Goodie AI does?
No. Goodie AI's published coverage is: Up to eleven, on Enterprise, which is unpriced. Gemini arrives on Pro and Claude only on Enterprise — so neither is available at any price they publish. Ours is three assistants and nothing else. If the surfaces on their list are where your buyers are, pick them — the table above is where you should be able to see that. Our trade is depth over breadth, and the “Goodie AI and Mentionify” rows above are the specific form it takes against them.
Can I try Mentionify and Goodie AI before deciding?
Ours is the form on this page — a buyer question and a work email, no account, and you get the answer, the score, the rival list and every cited source. On their side: No free plan. A 7-day free trial on Explorer. Yes on Explorer, which their pricing page calls fully self-serve. Pro and Enterprise are sales-led. Run the same question through both and compare what each one shows you, because one real answer about your own brand settles more than any feature table, including the one above.
Goodie AI or us?
Ask the question yourself.
Ask Gemini one real buyer question and see who it names. Whatever you end up deciding about Goodie AI, this costs nothing and needs no account.
One check per visitor per day. The full version explains every field it returns, and our pricing is what tracking it daily costs.
A check tells you today.
Tracking tells you which way.
Daily runs across ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude, and the movement between them — the one thing a single answer can never show you.